Skip to main content

Expanding Limb Salvage in Sarcoma Care

April 10, 2026
x-ray of pelvic reconstructive surgery
Advanced pelvic reconstruction. World-class surgical expertise. Precision that changes lives. That's MUSC musculoskeletal care.

With coordinated planning, advanced imaging, and reconstructive techniques, more patients with complex extremity sarcomas are being considered for limb preservation.

For patients with extremity sarcomas, the defining question is often straightforward: can the limb be saved?

Historically, many could not. Tumors involving major vessels or critical structures left limited options beyond amputation. That reality is shifting as surgical planning and reconstruction capabilities continue to advance

At MUSC Health’s NCI-designated Hollings Cancer Center, limb preservation is increasingly part of the conversation, even in complex cases.

The decision happens before the OR


Lee Leddy, M.D., MSCR

ICCE Chief, Musculoskeletal
Chairman, Orthopaedics & Physical Medicine Department
Division Director of Sarcoma, Hollings Cancer Center
Professor, College of Medicine

"The first few minutes are about building trust,” says Dr. Lee Leddy, chair of Orthopedics and Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation at MUSC and leader of the Sarcoma Disease Focus Team. “Patients are coming in with a lot of anxiety. They need to feel comfortable enough to hear what we’re going to talk about.”

From there, the focus turns to planning.

Each case is reviewed by a multidisciplinary sarcoma board, bringing together radiology, pathology, medical oncology, radiation oncology, orthopedic oncology, vascular surgery, and plastic surgery. Imaging is evaluated in detail, biopsy results are discussed and surgical strategy is aligned across specialties.

“There’s really no such thing as a game-time decision in these cases,” Leddy says. “Patients need to know before they go to sleep what the plan is and what to expect.”

This level of coordination allows teams to plan margins, anticipate reconstruction needs, and approach complex resections with greater confidence.

Expanding what’s technically possible

With that level of alignment, surgeons are able to approach tumors that previously would not have been considered resectable.

Advanced imaging helps define which structures are involved and which can be preserved. Vascular surgeons can restore blood flow when major vessels are resected. Plastic surgeons support reconstruction when large sections of tissue must be removed.

Reconstruction techniques are also evolving.

Magnetically controlled bone transport systems allow surgeons to regenerate large segments of bone after resection. In some cases, more than 15 centimeters of a patient’s femur can be restored. Pediatric patients may receive extendable prosthetics that lengthen over time without repeated surgeries.

These tools expand the surgical playbook, but the priorities remain consistent.

“The first goal is to treat the cancer and save the patient’s life,” Leddy says. “The second goal is to preserve the extremity.”

Limb preservation has clear implications for mobility, independence, and long-term function.

Planning beyond the resection

Successful tumor removal is only one part of care. Patients must also navigate recovery, rehabilitation, and ongoing surveillance.

Some return to near-normal function, while others face limitations that require careful discussion before treatment begins.

“We’re always thinking about what life is going to look like after this,” Leddy says. “Those conversations are just as important as the surgery itself.”

That includes setting expectations around function, managing wound healing risks, and supporting patients through long-term follow-up.

A team model that changes the equation

Limb salvage is not the result of a single technique or individual.

“It starts with building a collaborative team,” Leddy says. “That’s what allows us to push the limits of what’s possible.”

That model enables high-volume centers to take on complex cases and deliver consistent outcomes. It also reinforces a broader truth in sarcoma care: where patients are treated continues to influence what options are available.

Amputation remains necessary in some cases, but it is no longer the default.

For many patients, that shift changes both the treatment plan and the long-term outlook.

Recent Orthopaedics stories